Interoffice Memorandum Essay Example for Free

Interoffice Memorandum EssayThe Tarasoff case involved a move out victim, Tatiana Tarasoff, who was killed by an altogethereged acquaintance Prosejit Poddar. Poddar was a customer of a psychologist employed by the University of California, and during a therapy sitting he revealed his intent to murder Tatiana Tarasoff. The psychologist assessed Poddar as a danger and informed the campus police, and was held briefly and released. Shortly aft(prenominal) Poddar was released he indeed murdered Tatiana. The parents of Tatiana Tarasoff, plaintiffs, sued the school, campus police, therapists and anyone else who had contact. The argument was over whether the third party had the expert to be warned and had the right to be sheltered. The defendants maintained they owed no calling of care to the victim, and were immune from suit.The court stated that when a thickening presents a serious danger of violence to another there is an obligation, both legal and ethical, to use likely ca re to protect the intended victim against such danger. The therapist must take go to read or within their standard of profession determines the danger. This may call for the therapist to warn the intended victim or others likely to apprise the victim of the danger, to notify the police, or to take whatever other steps reasonably necessary under the circumstances.This ruling imposes a liability on all human receipts professionals to protect a victim from violent acts. There is a duty to protect and a duty to warn the potential third party victims to violence. This may bring on implications with the confidentiality of the client-helper relationship and may excessively cause violent clients to avoid treatment. This indeed will change the environment for human services and confidentiality as forthwith helpers may need to divulge confidential information to third parties in certain circumstances. The professional demand of keeping a clients information private is rooted in the eth ical codes as well as in statutory law. As professionals in the human services realm we also have a right to withhold confidential information in a court of law.To limp within the law and the code of ethics that govern us it is necessary to consider the situation from all points of view, develop a list of issues that represent multiple viewpoints, generate the possible decisions on whether to break client confidentiality, and what would the consequences of each decision. Each case in which the outcome of this case may implicate the duty to protect and warn, we must make sure we are addressing every avenue within a small meat of time in case of imminent danger that exists. This will be an adjustment with our client-helper relationships, and must be shared not only with each other but also shared with our clients.